For two decades, many state-level sex offender management strategies have included the Containment Approach. Based on a review of what was working at the time, English and colleagues (1996) identified the key components to include: victim-centeredness, multi-disciplinary collaboration, sex offender specific strategies including the polygraph, informed policies, and quality control. Since that time, the Containment Approach has continued in use and been supported by a number of studies (Aytes et al., 2001; Lowden et al., 2003).
With the advent of an emphasis on the core correctional principles, such as the Risk, Need, Responsivity (RNR) model for use with correctional populations, including clients who commit sexual offenses, many policymakers and practitioners have taken a critical look at the Containment Approach. The Colorado Sex Offender Management Board (SOMB) recently reviewed its Standards and Guidelines (2018) for treating, supervising, and polygraphing this population, and decided to recast the Containment Approach within the newly developed Treatment, Engagement, Assessment, Management, and Supervision (TEAMS) Model. While maintaining some of the features of the Containment Approach, this new model incorporates responsivity components more directly including a collaborative approach with the client, an emphasis on therapeutic engagement and alliance, and enhancing protective factors. Even the choice of acronym (TEAMS) was designed to change the narrative away from “containing the offender.” While still maintaining the use of the polygraph as an adjunct treatment and supervision strategy, changes have been made to its application for this population.
For anyone interested in or employing the Containment Approach, this session will highlight how one state has modified its strategy to create greater consistency with the RNR model and the current thinking related to clients who have been convicted of sexual offenses.
At the end of this training, you will be able to…
- Describe the current challenges associated with the Containment Approach for sex offense specific treatment and supervision.
- Apply new approaches to the treatment and supervision of those who have been convicted of sexual offenses.
- Assess the current challenges associated with sexual offense history disclosure work in sex offense specific treatment.
- Use new approaches to the issue of sexual offense history disclosure.
- Discuss the research related to the Containment Approach, and how to modify the approach without losing the research-supported components.
More cost-effective and time-efficient than attending an in-person workshop but covering the same content, this innovative On Demand training is the first-of-its-kind.
Why Train With GIFR?
Eliminate hidden costs of in-person trainings including travel, hotel, food, and gas
Implement these evidence-based best practices to improve the treatment and supervision of those who have been convicted of sexual offenses.
Earn 4 Continuing Education Credits from APA, ASWB, NBCC, ANCC, NAADAC, and CPA
Christopher Lobanov-Rostovsky has worked for the Division of Criminal Justice within the Colorado Department of Public Safety as the Program Manager for the Colorado Sex Offender Management Board since 2006, where he is responsible for overseeing the development of standards for the treatment and management of sexual offenders, approving treatment providers, and providing legislative and policy input. Mr. Lobanov-Rostovsky holds a Master Degree in Social Work from the University of Michigan, and has been a Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW) since 1990. Prior to his current position, Mr. Lobanov-Rostovsky worked as a clinician and evaluator of adult sex offenders and juveniles who commit sexual offenses. Mr. Lobanov-Rostovsky also works as a private consultant for a variety of federal, state, tribal, and private agencies in developing and enhancing sex offender management services, including providing training and technical assistance, program assessment, literature reviews, peer review of grant solicitations and reports, and legislative and policy development. Finally, Mr. Lobanov-Rostovsky has published a number of articles and chapters related to federal and state sex offender management public policy, and was awarded the 2015 National Adolescent Perpetration Network Advocacy Award for his work in promoting evidence-based polices and legislation.
The Global Institute of Forensic Research, Inc is approved by the American Psychological Association, National Board of Certified Counselors, National Association of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Counselors, Canadian Psychological Association, and the New York Department of Education to sponsor continuing education trainings. The American Nurses Credentialing Center accepts Continuing Education Credit sponsored by the American Psychological Association. The Global Institute of Forensic Research, Inc. (provider #1371) is also approved as a provider for social work continuing education by the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) www.aswb.org, through the Approved Continuing Education (ACE) program. ASWB Approval Period: June 8, 2019 – June 8, 2022. Social workers should contact their regulatory board to determine course approval. The Global Institute of Forensic Research, Inc maintains responsibility for this program and its contents. Refund/Cancellation Policy: If you wish to request a refund on account of technical difficulties, please contact [email protected] The Global Institute of Forensic Research, Inc. reports no conflicts of interest in the development and sponsorship of this training. The Global Institute of Forensic Research, Inc receives no commercial support for this Continuing Education program or from its presenter(s). The number of CE Credits provided for this training is commensurate to its length in hours. The level of instruction of this training is “Introductory”. The format for this presentation is live webinar training with interactivity. The intended audience for this training includes mental health, correctional, and legal professionals.
Note 1: The CPA’s approval of an individual, group, or organization as a CE Sponsor or Provider is restricted to the activities described in the approved application or annual report form. The CPA’s approval does not extend to any other CE activity the Sponsor or Provider might offer. In granting its approval, the CPA assumes no legal or financial obligations to Sponsors, Providers, or to those individuals who might participate in a Sponsor or Provider’s CE activities or programs. Further, responsibility for the content, provision, and delivery of any CE activity approved by the CPA remains that of the CE Sponsor or Provider. The CPA disclaims all legal liability associated with the content, provision, and delivery of the approved CE activity.