Thank you for choosing GIFR!

You will be redirected to our secure payment platform to finish the checkout process. All prices displayed are in USD. Upon completing your order, be sure to return to your account on gifrinc.com. Please press “Continue” to proceed.

If you are buying more than one seat for a training, you will be able to assign the training to your intended learners by hovering over “My Account” on the top right corner and clicking on “My Account” and then clicking on “Learners”.

On Demand Trainings

Browse All Trainings

The Hidden Costs of Time Spent in Pretrial Detention

US$0 Regular Price

US$0 GIFR Member Price


New to GIFR? Welcome! Create your account by clicking here. If you already have an account, please log in to proceed.

CE Credits: 1.5 Credits
Length: 1.5 Hours
Level: Introductory
CE Eligibility: APA, ASWB ACE, ANCC, NAADAC, CPA, NYSED
Training Style: Video
Category: GIFR Membership Exclusive
Intended Audience: Mental Health, Correctional, and Legal Professionals

Training Description
Pretrial detention is consequential for individuals, families, and communities. When people are incarcerated pretrial, they are unable to work, take care of their families, or meet their daily obligations. Surprisingly, few people are denied pretrial release. Rather, most people detained pretrial are incarcerated because they were unable to meet the financial burden of their bond. Legal actors grapple with the trade-off between the public safety aspects versus the unintended negative aspects of pretrial detention. There is a tenuous link between detention and recidivism generally, but little research studies the association between pretrial detention and crime and punishment.
During this MHS Public Safety Webinar, Dr. Ian Silver, Quantitative Criminologist at RTI, and Jason Walker, a Research Criminologist in the Courts Systems Research Program at RTI International will present research from multiple counties in different regions of the U.S. to test the criminogenic and punitive nature of pretrial detention. The results from multiple difference-in-difference models produce evidence suggesting that the time spent in pretrial detention is associated with negative outcomes during pretrial. The effects of pretrial detention, moreover, differed by the biological sex of the defendant. The policy implications of these results are discussed within the broader pretrial system, focusing on efforts to reduce the negative outcomes associated with pretrial detention.
Trainer Biography
Ian A. Silver is a Quantitative Criminologist with RTI’s Center for Courts and Corrects. Dr. Silver’s formal training as a quantitative criminologist focused on Criminal Justice Policy has created an interest in applying statistical theory and techniques to generate causal inferences from non-experimental data. As such, his primary career focus is on conducting high-quality research in the social sciences focused on applying, developing, and evaluating advanced quantitative techniques. Dr. Silver’s recent work has appeared in the Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Justice Quarterly, and the Journal of Experimental Criminology.
Jason Walker is a Research Criminologist in the Courts Systems Research Program at RTI International. His primary interests include sentencing, risk assessments, pretrial processes, and public health in corrections. He has developed an expertise in data management, data analytics, and research methods for examining decision-making in the courts, utilization of risk assessments in the criminal justice system, and infectious disease outbreaks in correctional facilities. Jason is also currently a doctoral candidate in the School of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Arizona State University.
Learning Objectives
At the end of this webinar, you will be able to…
  • Describe how time spent in pretrial detention could influence negative outcomes during pretrial supervision.
  • Evaluate the potential broader effects of pretrial detention on the lives of defendants.
  • Discuss the effects of time spent in pretrial detention on failure to appear, new criminal arrest, new violent criminal arrest, and convictions.
  • Identify and develop policies that could potentially reduce the effects of time spent in pretrial detention on outcomes during pretrial.

1 Sponsorship: The Global Institute of Forensic Research, Inc is approved by the American Psychological Association, National Association of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Counselors, and Canadian Psychological Association to sponsor continuing education trainings. Global Institute of Forensic Research (GIFR) has been approved by NBCC as an approved Continuing Education provider, ACEP No. 6711. Programs that do not qualify for NBCC credit are clearly identified. GIFR is solely responsible for all aspects of the programs. The American Nurses Credentialing Center accepts Continuing Education Credit sponsored by the American Psychological Association. The Global Institute of Forensic Research, Inc (provider #1371) is also approved as a provider for social work continuing education by the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) www.aswb.org, through the Approved Continuing Education (ACE) program. ACE provider approval period: 6/8/2022-6/8/2025. Social workers should contact their regulatory board to determine course approval. The Global Institute of Forensic Research, Inc maintains responsibility for this program and its contents.
2 Refund/Cancellation Policy: If you wish to request a refund on account of technical difficulties, please contact [email protected].
3 Commercial Supports: The Global Institute of Forensic Research, Inc reports no conflicts of interest in the development and sponsorship of this training. The Global Institute of Forensic Research, Inc receives no commercial support for its Continuing Education programs or from its presenters.

Note 1: The CPA's approval of an individual, group, or organization as a CE Sponsor or Provider is restricted to the activities described in the approved application or annual report form. The CPA's approval does not extend to any other CE activity the Sponsor or Provider might offer. In granting its approval, the CPA assumes no legal or financial obligations to Sponsors, Providers, or to those individuals who might participate in a Sponsor or Provider's CE activities or programs. Further, responsibility for the content, provision, and delivery of any CE activity approved by the CPA remains that of the CE Sponsor or Provider. The CPA disclaims all legal liability associated with the content, provision, and delivery of the approved CE activity.